Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood Magpies
Aug 28, 2026, 9:40 AM UTC
FTWestern Bulldogs 96 - 93 Collingwood Magpies
Team Strength Comparison
Western BulldogsvsCollingwood Magpies· AFL Premiership
Match Analysis
Western Bulldogs rate as the stronger all-round team across most dimensions, while the market has priced them as marginal underdogs. The Bulldogs hold advantages in overall power (84 vs 81), offense (81 vs 58), dominance (86 vs 82), and consistency (71 vs 38). Collingwood's sole clear edge is in defense (91 vs 88), a narrow margin. The 23-point gulf between the teams' offensive ratings is particularly stark: Collingwood's 58 is the lowest metric across both squads, suggesting structural weakness in ball movement or forward efficiency. Yet the market implies Collingwood at 51 percent probability (1.87 decimal) versus Western Bulldogs at 49 percent (1.92), creating a meaningful divergence. The ratings favour the Bulldogs' quality and reliability, while the market leans slightly toward the Magpies. Head-to-head context muddies the picture. The teams split their two recent meetings: Collingwood won 76–70 in March 2025, but the Bulldogs responded with a four-point victory (97–93) in May 2026, demonstrating neither side has dominated the matchup. Recent form slightly favors the Magpies. Collingwood's past five results read LWWWW—four wins from the last five games, despite their volatility rating of 38. Western Bulldogs show LLWWW, with two consecutive losses before two wins, suggesting they entered this recent win streak from deeper uncertainty. The Bulldogs' consistency rating of 71 versus Collingwood's 38 indicates they should be more reliable overall, yet the Magpies' current winning momentum and defensive solidity (91 rating) compete directly against the Bulldogs' offensive advantage. The divergence between the ratings' picture and the market's narrow lean toward Collingwood reflects genuine tactical tension rather than obvious mispricing.
A descriptive read of our own ratings against the market — not a prediction.
Metric by metric
Western Bulldogs · Collingwood Magpies — our 0-100 ratings, side by side
Season trends
up to 6 seasons, both teams
Archived Aug 24, 2026, 01:11 AM UTC
Odds Analysis & Market Prediction
With each bookmaker's margin removed, the market makes Collingwood Magpies the favourite at 51%. 11 of 11 bookmakers agree.
Fair win probability
Average bookmaker margin 5%.
Pre-Match Odds Comparison · Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood Magpies
| Book | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|
| SportsBet | 2.00 | 1.85 |
| Neds | 1.96 | 1.85 |
| Ladbrokes | 1.96 | 1.85 |
| PointsBet (AU) | 1.95 | 1.85 |
| Betfair | 2.02 | 1.96 |
| TABtouch | 1.93 | 1.85 |
| Unibet | 1.92 | 1.84 |
| PlayUp | 1.92 | 1.85 |
| Bet Right | 2.00 | 1.82 |
| Dabble AU | 1.92 | 1.83 |
| Betr | 1.95 | 1.85 |
Moneyline captured before the first bounce — historical reference only. 18+
Head-to-Head Record
| Regular Season · 2026 | 2026-05-30 | Western Bulldogs 97-93 Collingwood Magpies | W |
| Regular Season · 2025 | 2025-03-21 | Western Bulldogs 70-76 Collingwood Magpies | L |
Western Bulldogs — Recent Form — Last Games
- 2026-08-06Western Bulldogs vs North Melbourne Kangaroos 77-100
- 2026-07-31Fremantle Dockers vs Western Bulldogs 78-41
- 2026-07-25Western Bulldogs vs Richmond Tigers 105-48
- 2026-07-19Gold Coast Suns vs Western Bulldogs 68-77
- 2026-07-12Western Bulldogs vs West Coast Eagles 86-70
- 2026-07-03Sydney Swans vs Western Bulldogs 90-55
- 2026-06-21St Kilda Saints vs Western Bulldogs 61-83
- 2026-06-11Western Bulldogs vs Adelaide Crows 64-121
Collingwood Magpies — Recent Form — Last Games
- 2026-07-30Collingwood Magpies vs Geelong Cats 72-97
- 2026-07-23Adelaide Crows vs Collingwood Magpies 74-108
- 2026-07-18Collingwood Magpies vs Carlton Blues 90-69
- 2026-07-10Collingwood Magpies vs North Melbourne Kangaroos 89-85
- 2026-07-04Gold Coast Suns vs Collingwood Magpies 98-104
- 2026-06-27Collingwood Magpies vs Richmond Tigers 106-72
- 2026-06-20Collingwood Magpies vs Port Adelaide Power 78-52
- 2026-06-08Collingwood Magpies vs Melbourne Demons 75-83